Trabajos de Prehistoria, Vol 74, No 2 (2017)

La Arqueología y la Antropología cultural: entrelazamientos pretéritos y presentes


https://doi.org/10.3989/tp.2017.12191

Araceli González Vázquez
Institución Milá y Fontanals, CSIC , España
orcid http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4241-9347

Resumen


Este artículo explora los entrelazamientos pretéritos y presentes de la Arqueología y la Antropología cultural. Se centra en cuestiones de naturaleza teórica, epistemológica y metodológica. En particular, examina debates recientes ligados al llamado giro ontológico de las Ciencias Sociales y las Humanidades.

Palabras clave


Arqueología; Antropología; Interdisciplinariedad; Giro ontológico

Texto completo:


PDF

Referencias


Alberti, B. 2014: “Archaeology, risk, and the alter-politics of materiality”. Theorizing the Contemporary, Cultural Anthropology website, January 13, 2014. https://culanth.org/fieldsights/476-archaeology-risk-and-the-alter-politics-of-materiality.

Alberti, B. 2016: “Archaeologies of Ontology”. Annual Review of Anthropology 45: 163-179.

Alberti, B. y Bray, T. L. 2009: “Animating Archaeology. Of subjects, objects and alternative ontologies”. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 19 (3): 337-441.

Alberti, B. y Marshall, Y. 2009: “Animating archaeology: local theories and conceptually open-ended methodologies”. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 19 (3): 344-356.

Alberti, B.; Fowles, S.; Holbraad, M.; Marshall, Y. y Witmore, C. 2011: “Worlds otherwise: archaeology, anthropology, and ontological difference”. Current Anthropology 52 (6): 896-912.

Alberti, B.; Jones, M.; y Pollard, J. (eds.) 2013: Archaeology after interpretation. Returning materials to archaeological theory. Left Coast Press. Walnut Creek. Argyrou, V. 2017: “Ontology, ‘hauntology’, and the ‘turn’ that keeps anthropology turning”. History of the Human Sciences 30(1): 50 - 65.

Bahn, P. (ed.) 2014: The History of Archaeology: an introduction. Routledge. Londres.

Barad, K. 2003: “Posthumanist performativity: how matter comes to matter”. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 28 (3): 801-31.

Barad, K. 2007: Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum Physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Duke University Press. Durham (NC).

Barnard, A. 2000: History and theory in Anthropology.Cambridge University Press. Cambridge.

Bauman, Z. 2007: Consuming life. Polity. Cambridge.

Bessire, L. y Bond, D. 2014: “Ontological anthropology and the deferral of critique”. American Ethnologist 41 (3): 440-456.

Binford, L. R. 1962: “Archaeology as Anthropology”. American Antiquity 28 (2): 217-225.

Binford, L. R. 1972: An Archaeological Perspective. Seminar Press. Nueva York.

Binford, S. R. y Binford, L. R. 1968: New Perspectives in Archaeology. Aldine Publishing Co. Chicago.

Bintliff, J. y Pearce, M. (eds.) 2011: The death of anthropological theory? Oxbow Books. Oxford.

Bird-David, N. 1999: “Animism” revisited: personhood, environment, and relational epistemology”. Current Anthropology 40 (1): S67-91.

Blaser, M. 2014: “The political ontology of doing sameness … and difference”. Theorizing the Contemporary, Cultural Anthropology website, January 13, 2014. https://culanth.org/fieldsights/474-the-political-ontology-of-doing-difference-and-sameness.

Bonte, P. 1974: “From ethnology to anthropology: on critical approaches in the human sciences”. Critique of Anthropology 2: 36-57 y 3: 1-26.

Brown, B. 2001: “Thing theory”. Critical Inquiry 28 (1): 1-22.

Bryant L. 2011: The democracy of objects. Open Humanities. Ann Arbor.

Bryant, L.; Srnicek, N. y Harman, G. 2011: The speculative turn. Continental materialism and realism. Series Anamnesis re.press. Melbourne.

Clarke, D. L. 1968: Analytical Archaeology. Methuen and Co. Londres.

Clarke, D.L. 1972: Models in Archaeology. Methuen and Co. Londres.

Cochrane, E. E. y Gardner, A. (eds.) 2011: Evolutionary and interpretive archaeologies: a dialogue. Left Coast Press. Walnut Creek.

Comaroff, J. y Comaroff, J.L. (eds.) 2001: Milennial capitalism and the culture of neoliberalism. Duke University Press. Durham y Londres.

Conkey, M. W. 2003: “Has Feminism changed Archaeology?”. Signs 28 (3): 867-880.

Conkey, M. W. y Spector, J. 1984: “Archaeology and the study of gender”. Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory 7: 1-38.

Course, M. 2010: “Of words and fog: linguistic relativity and Amerindian ontology”. Anthropological Theory 10 (3): 247-263.

Criado-Boado, F. 2016: “Tangled between paradigms in the neo-baroque era”. Archaeological Dialogues 23 (2): 152-158.

Crutzen, P. y E. Stoermer 2000: “The Anthropocene”. IGBP Newsletter 41: 17-18.

Davis, K. 2015: “The politics of the ‘turn’”. European Journal of Women´s Studies 22 (2): 125-128.

DeLanda, M. 2006: A new philosophy of society: Assemblage Theory and Social Complexity. Continuum. Londres y Nueva York.

Deleuze, G. y Guattari, F. 1980: Mille plateaux. Éditions de Minuit. París.

Descola, P. 1992: “Societies of nature and the nature of society”. En A. Kuper (ed.): Conceptualizing Society. Routledge. Londres: 107-126.

Descola, P. 1996: “Constructing natures: symbolic ecology and social practice”. En P. Descola, P. y Pálsson, G. (eds.): Nature and society: anthropological perspectives. Routledge. Londres: 82-102.

Descola, P. 2005: Par-delà nature et culture. Éditions Gallimard. París.

Descola, P. y Pálsson, G. (eds.) 1996: Nature and society: anthropological perspectives. Routledge. Londres.

Díaz-Andreu, M. 2007: A World History of nineteenth-century Archaeology: nationalism, colonialism and the past. Oxford University Press. Oxford.

Edgeworth, M. 2016: “Grounded objects: Archaeology and speculative realism”. Archaeological Dialogues 23 (1): 93-113.

Fowler, C. 2013: The emergent past: a relational realist archaeology of Early Bronze Age mortuary practices. Oxford University Press. Oxford.

Fowler, C. y Harris, O. J. T. 2015: “Enduring relations: exploring a paradox of new materialism”. Journal of Material Culture 20 (2): 127-48.

Fowles, S. 2016: “The perfect subject (postcolonial object studies)”. Journal of Material Culture 21 (1): 9-27.

Gabriel, M. 2015: Fields of sense: a new realist Ontology. Edinburgh University Press. Edimburgo.

Gell, A. 1998: Art and agency: an anthropological theory. Oxford University Press. Oxford.

Gero, J. M.; Conkey, M. W. y Wright, M. 1991: Engendering Archaeology: women in Prehistory. Blackwell. Oxford.

Gilman, A. 1984: “Explaining the Upper Paleolithic revolution”. En M. Spriggs (ed.): Marxist perspectives in Archaeology. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge: 115-126.

González Abrisketa, O. y Carro-Ripalda, S. 2016: “La apertura ontológica de la antropología contemporánea”. Revista de dialectología y tradiciones populares 71 (1): 101-128.

González-Ruibal, A. 2008: “Time to destroy: an Archaeology of supermodernity”. Current Anthropology 49 (2): 247-279.

González-Ruibal, A. (ed.) 2013: Reclaiming Archaeology: beyond the tropes of modernity. Routledge. Londres.

González-Ruibal, A. 2014: “Returning to where we have never been: excavating the ruins of modernity”. En B. Olsen y Þ Pétursdóttir (eds.): Ruin memories: materialities, aesthetics and the Archaeology of the recent past. Routledge. Londres: 367-388.

Gosden, Ch. 1999: Anthropology and Archaeology: a changing relationship. Routledge. Londres.

Hamilakis, Y. 2013: Archaeology and the senses: human experience, memory, and affect. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge.

Hamilakis, Y. y Duke, P. 2007: Archaeology and capitalism: from ethics to politics. Left Coast Press. Walnut Creek.

Haraway, D. 1991: Simians, cyborgs and women: the reinvention of nature. Routledge. Nueva York.

Haraway, D. 2003: The companion species manifesto: dogs, people, and significant otherness. Prickly Paradigm Press. Chicago.

Haraway, D. J. 2007: When species meet. University of Minnesota Press. Minneapolis.

Harman, G. 2005: Guerrilla metaphysics. Open Court. Chicago.

Harman, G. 2009: Prince of networks: Bruno Latour and Metaphysics. Series Anamnesis re.press. Melbourne.

Harvey G. 2005: Animism: respecting the living world. Hurst & Co. Londres.

Henare, A.; Holbraad, M. y Wastell, S. 2007: Thinking through things. Theorising artefacts ethnographically. Routledge. Londres.

Herschend, F. 2015: “Archaeology is History or it's History”. En Ch. Hillerdal y J. Siapkas (eds.): Debating archaeological empiricism: the ambiguity of material evidence. Routledge. Nueva York: 125-143.

Hillerdal, Ch. y Siapkas, J. 2015 (eds.): Debating archaeological empiricism: the ambiguity of material evidence. Routledge. Nueva York.

Hodder, I. 1982a: Symbols in action. Ethnoarchaeological studies of material culture. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge.

Hodder, I. 1982b: The present past: an introduction to Anthropology for archaeologists. Batsford. Londres.

Hodder, I. 1982c: Symbolic and structural Archaeology. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge.

Hodder, I. 1986: Reading the past: current approaches to interpretation in Archaeology. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge.

Hodder, I. 2012: Entangled: an Archaeology of the relationships between humans and things. Wiley-Blackwell. Londres.

Hodder, I. 2016: Studies in human-thing entanglement. Creative Commons Attribution.

Hodder, I. y Hutson, S. 2003: Reading the past: current approaches to interpretation in Archaeology. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge.

Holbraad, M. 2012: Truth in motion: the recursive Anthropology of cuban divination. Chicago University Press. Chicago.

Holbraad, M. y Pedersen M. A. 2017: The ontological turn: an anthropological exposition. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge.

Ingold, T. 1994: “General introduction”. En T. Ingold. Companion encyclopedia of Anthropology. Routledge. Londres: XIII-XXII.

Ingold, T. 2000: The perception of environment: essays on livelihood, dwelling and skill. Londres. Routledge.

Ingold, T. 2007: Lines: a brief history. Routledge. Londres.

Ingold, T. 2011: Being alive: essays on movement, knowledge and description. Routledge. Londres.

Ingold, T. 2012: “Toward an ecology of materials”. Annual Reviews of Anthropology 41: 427-442.

Ingold, T. 2013: Making: Anthropology, Archaeology, Art and Architecture. Routledge. Londres.

Ingold, T. 2014: “ThatÅLs enough about ethnography!”. HAU, Journal of Ethnographic Theory 4 (1): 383-395.

Ingold, T. y P.lsson, G. 2013: Biosocial becomings. Integrating social and biological Anthropology. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge.

Jones, A. M. y Alberti, B. 2013: “Archaeology after interpretation”. En B. Alberti, M. Jones y J. Pollard, J. (eds.): Archaeology after interpretation. Returning materials to archaeological theory. Left Coast Press. Walnut Creek: 15-35.

Kirksey, S. E. y Helmreich, S. 2010: “The emergence of multispecies ethnography”. Cultural Anthropology 25 (4): 545-576.

Knauft, B. M. 2006: “Anthropology in the middle”. Anthropological Theory 6 (4): 407-430.

Kohn, E. 2013: How forests think: toward an Anthropology beyond the human. University of California Press. Berkeley.

Kohn, E. 2015: “Anthropology of ontologies”. Annual Review of Anthropology 44: 311-327.

Kristiansen, K. 2004: “Genes versus agents. A discussion of the widening theoretical gap in archaeology”. Archaeological Dialogues 11 (2): 77-99.

Kristiansen, K.; Šmejda, L. y Turek, J. 2015: Paradigm found: archaeological theory –present, past, future. Essays in Honour of Evzen Neustupny. Oxbow Books. Oxford.

Krotz, E. 1997: “Anthropologies of the South: their rise, their silencing, their characteristics”. Critique of Anthropology 17 (3): 237-251.

Krotz, E. 2015: “Las Antropologías segundas en América Latina: interpelaciones y recuperaciones”. Cuadernos de Antropología Social 42: 5-17.

Laidlaw, J. 2012: “Ontologically challenged”. Anthropology of this century 4. http://aotcpress.com/articles/ontologically-challenged/.

Laidlaw, J. y Heywood, P. 2013: “One more turn and you're there”. Anthropology of this century 7. http://aotcpress.com/articles/turn/.

Latour, B. y Woolgar, S. 1979: Laboratory life: the social construction of scientific facts. Sage. Londres.

Latour, B. 1987: Science in action. Harvard University Press. Cambridge.

Latour, B. 1988: The pasteurization of France. Harvard University Press. Cambridge.

Latour, B. 1991: Nous n´avons jamais été modernes: Essai d´anthropologie simétrique. La Découverte. París.

Latour, B. 1996: Aramis, or the Love of Technology. Harvard University Press. Cambridge.

Latour, B. 1999a: Politiques de la nature. Comment faire entrer les sciences en démocratie. La Découverte. París.

Latour, B. 1999b: Pandora´s hope: essays on the reality of science studies. Harvard University Press. Cambridge.

Latour, B. 2005: Reassembling the social: an introduction to Actor-Network Theory. Oxford University Press. Oxford.

Latour, B. 2012: Enquête sur les modes d´existence. Une anthropologie des modernes. La Découverte. París.

Latour, B. 2013a: An inquiry into modes of existence. An Anthropology of the moderns. Harvard University Press. Cambridge.

Latour, B. 2013b: “Another way to compose the common world”. 132 AAA Annual Meetings, Chicago, IL, November 23. http://www.bruno-latour.fr/sites/default/files/132-AAA-CHICAGO-PHIl-ANTH-2013.pdf.

Lévi-Strauss, C. 1960: “Le trois sources de la réflexion ethnologique”. Revue de l´enseignement supérieur 1: 43-50.

Lucas, G. 2012: Understanding the archaeological record. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge.

Lucas, G. 2016: “The paradigm concept in archaeology”. World Archaeology.

Marshall, Y. y Alberti, B. 2014: “A matter of difference: Karen Barad, Ontology and archaeological bodies”. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 24 (1): 19-36.

Martin, A.M. 2013: Archaeology beyond Postmodernity. A science of the social. Altamira Press. Plymouth.

Mateo Dieste, J. L. y Coello de la Rosa, A. 2016: Elogio de la Antropología histórica: enfoques, métodos y aplicaciones al estudio del poder y del colonialismo. Prensas Universitarias de Zaragoza. Zaragoza.

McGuire, R. 1992: A marxist Archaeology. Percheron Press. Nueva York.

McGuire, R. 2009: Archaeology as political action. University of California Press. Berkeley.

McGuire, R. y Paynter, R. 1991: The Archaeology of inequality. Oxford. Blackwell.

Miller D. 1987: Material culture and mass consumption. Blackwell. Oxford.

Miller, D. 1998: “Why some things matter”. En D. Miller (ed.): Material cultures: why some things matter. UCL Press. Londres: 3-21.

Miller D. 2005: “Materiality: an introduction”. En D. Miller (ed.): Materiality. Duke University Press. Durham NC: 1-50.

Nichols, D. L.; Joyce, R. A. y Gillespie, S.. 2003: “Is Archaeology Anthropology?”. En S. D. Gillespie y D.L. Nichols (eds.): Archaeology is Anthropology. American Anthropological Association. Arlington:

-16.

Olsen, B. 2003: “Material culture after text: Re-membering things”. Norwegian Archaeological Review 36 (3): 87-104.

Olsen, B. 2010: In defense of things: Archaeology and the ontology of objects. Altamira Press. Plymouth.

Olsen, B. 2012a: “After interpretation: remembering Archaeology”. Current Swedish Archaeology 20: 11-34.

Olsen, B. 2012b: “Symmetrical Archaeology”. En I. Hodder (ed.): Archaeological Theory Today. Polity Press. Cambridge: 208-228.

Olsen, B.; Shanks, M.; Webmoor, T. y Witmore, C. 2012: Archaeology: the discipline of things. University of California Press. Berkeley.

Olsen, B. y Witmore, C. 2015: “Archaeology, symmetry and the ontology of things. A response to critics”. Archaeological dialogues 22 (2): 187-197.

Paynter, R. 1988: “Steps to an archaeology of capitalism”. En M. Leone y P. Potter (eds.): The recovery of meaning. Smithsonian Institution Press. Washington: 407-33.

Pedersen, M.A. 2012: “Common Nonsense: A review of certain recent reviews of the Ontological Turn”. Anthropology of this century 5. http://aotcpress.com/articles/common_nonsense/.

Phillips, Ph. 1955: “American Archaeology and General Anthropological Theory”. Southwestern Journal of Anthropology 11 (3): 246-250.

Preucel, R.W. 2006: Archaeological Semiotics. Blackwell. Malden.

Preucel, R.W. 2016: “Pragmatic Archaeology and semiotic mediation”. Semiotic Review 4: Im/materialities, November 2016 https://semioticreview.com/ojs/index.php/sr/article/view/11.

Preucel, R. W. y Mrozowski, S. A. (eds.) 2010: Contemporary Archaeology in theory: the new pragmatism. Blackwell. Londres.

Ramos, A. R. 2012: “The politics of perspectivism”. Annual Review of Anthropology 41: 481-494.

Restrepo, E. y Escobar, A. 2005: “‘Other anthropologies and anthropology otherwise’: steps to a world anthropologies framework”. Critique of Anthropology 25 (2): 99-129.

Ribeiro, G. L. y Escobar, A. 2008: Antropologías del mundo: transformaciones disciplinarias dentro de sistemas de poder. Envión Editores-Ciesas-Wenner Gren. Popayán.

Ribeiro, A. 2016: “Archaeology will be just fine”. Archaeological Dialogues 23 (2): 146-151.

Shanks, M. 1992: Experiencing the past : on the character of archaeology. Routledge. Londres.

Shanks, M. 2007: “Symmetrical Archaeology”. World Archaeology 39 (4): 589-596.

Shanks, M. y Tilley, C. 1987a: Re-constructing Archaeology. Theory and practice. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge.

Shanks, M. y Tilley, C. 1987b: Social theory and Archaeology. Polity Press. Cambridge.

Shennan, S. 2004: “Analytical archaeology”. En J. Bintliff (ed.): A companion to Archaeology. Blackwell. Oxford: 3-20.

Simondon, G. 1964: L´individu et sa génèse physico-biologique. PUF. París.

Spector, J. M. 1991: “What this awl means: towards a feminist archaeology”. En J. M. Gero, M. W. Conkey y M. Wright (eds.): Engendering archaeology: women and prehistory. Blackwell. Oxford: 388-406.

Spriggs, M. (ed.) 1984: Marxist perspectives in Archaeology. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge.

Strathern, M. 1988: The gender of the gift. Problems with women and problems with society in Melanesia. University of California Press. Berkeley.

Strathern, M. 1991: Partial connections. Rowman and Littlefield. Savage.

Strathern, M. 1995: Schifting contexts: Transformations in Anthropological knowledge. Routledge. Londres.

Thiéry, O. y Houdart, S. 2011: Humains, non-humains. Comment repeupler les Sciences Sociales. La Découverte. París.

Thomas, J. 2015: “The future of archaeological theory”. Antiquity 89 (348): 1287-1296.

Tilley, C. 1994: A phenomenology of landscape. Places, paths, and monuments. Berg. Londres.

Tilley, C. 1999: Metaphor and material culture. Blackwell. Oxford.

Trigger, B.G. 1989: A history of archaeological thought. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge.

Trigger, B. 1993: “Marxism in contemporary Western archaeology”. En M. B. Schiffer (ed.): Archaeological Method and Theory. University of Arizona Press. Tucson: 159-200.

Trigger, B. 1995: “Archaeology and the integrated circus”. Critique of Anthropology 15 (4): 319-335.

Vasileva, B. 2015: “Stuck with/in a “turn”: Can we metaphorize better in Science and Technology Studies?”. Social Studies of Science 45 (3): 454-461.

Vigh, H. E. y Sausdal, D. B. 2014: “From essence back to existence: anthropology beyond the ontological turn”. Anthropological Theory 14 (1): 49-73.

Viveiros de Castro, E. 1998: “Cosmological deixis and Amerindian perspectivism”. The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 4 (3): 469-88.

Viveiros de Castro, E. 2003: “(anthropology) AND (science)”. After-dinner speech at ‘Anthropology and Science’, the 5th Decennial Conference of the Association of Social Anthropologists of Great Britain

and Commonwealth, 14th July 2003. Manchester Papers in Social Anthropology 7. University of Manchester. Manchester.

Viveiros de Castro, E. 2009: Métaphysiques cannibales. PUF. París.

Viveiros de Castro, E. 2011: “Zeno and the art of Anthropology: of lies, beliefs, paradoxes and other truths”. Common Knowledge 17 (1): 128-145.

Wagner, R. 1978: Lethal speech: Daribi myth as symbolic obviation. Cornell University Press. Ithaca.

Wagner, R. 1981: The Invention of Culture. University of Chicago Press. Chicago.

Webmoor, T. y Witmore, C.L. 2008: “Things are us! A commentary on human/things relations under the banner of a ‘social’ archaeology”. Norwegian Archaeology Review 41 (1): 1-18.

Wiley, A. 1991: “Gender theory and the archaeological record. Why is there no archaeology of gender?”. En J. M. Gero, M. W. Conkey y M. Wright (eds.): Engendering Archaeology: women in Prehistory. Blackwell. Oxford: 31-54.

Willerslev R. 2007: Soul hunters: hunting, animism, and personhood among the siberian Yukaghirs. University of California Press. Berkeley.

Willerslev, R. 2012: “Laughing at the spirits in North Siberia: is animism being taken too seriously?”. E-Flux Journal 36 (7): 13-22.

Willey, G. R. y Phillips, Ph. 1958: Method and Theory in American Archaeology. University of Chicago Press. Chicago.

Witmore, C. L. 2007: “Symmetrical archaeology: excerpts from a Manifesto”. World Archaeology 39 (4): 546-562.

Witmore, C. L. 2014: “Archaeology and the new materialisms”. Journal of Contemporary Archaeology 1 (2): 203-246.

Witmore, C. 2015: “Archaeology and the second empiricism”. En Hillerdal, C. y J. Siapkas (eds.) Debating Archaeological Empiricism. The Ambiguity of Material Evidence. Routledge. London: 37-67.

Woolgar, S. y Lezaun, J. 2013: “The wrong bin bag: a turn to ontology in science and technology studies?”. Social Studies of Science 43 (3): 321-340.

Woolgar, S. y Lezaun, J. 2015: “Missing the (question) mark? What is a turn to ontology?”. Social Studies of Science 45 (3): 462-467.




Copyright (c) 2017 Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC)

Licencia de Creative Commons
Esta obra está bajo una licencia de Creative Commons Reconocimiento 4.0 Internacional.


Contacte con la revista trabajosdeprehistoria.cchs@cchs.csic.es

Soporte técnico soporte.tecnico.revistas@csic.es