Technomorphological study of the litic industry of Ambrona (Soria)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3989/tp.1997.v54.i1.380Keywords:
Middle Pleistocene, Acheulian, Lithic industryAbstract
In spite of the plentiful bibliography existent regarding the Pleistocene deposits of Ambrona, its lithic industry has been poorly documented. This fact becomes more marked in the «Upper Complex» of this site, where only a list with the total number of pieces contained in its sequence has been published. This paper tries to make up for this deficiency characterizing the lithic industry found in this important Pleistocene site in a technomorphological framework and finally providing a setting for these lithic series in the Acheulian period of the Iberian Peninsula, «The Lower Complex», attributed to Middle Pleistocene with Acheulian artefacts, is situated in the El Sartalejo, La Maya II, Áridos or Torralba «orbit», and the «Upper Complex», attributed to Upper Middle Pleistocene or even to a latter moment with final Acheulian artefacts, is like La Maya I or phase III of Atapuerca.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Downloads
Published
1997-06-30
How to Cite
Panera Gallego, J., & Rubio Jara, S. (1997). Technomorphological study of the litic industry of Ambrona (Soria). Trabajos De Prehistoria, 54(1), 71–97. https://doi.org/10.3989/tp.1997.v54.i1.380
Issue
Section
Articles
License
Copyright (c) 1997 Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
© CSIC. Manuscripts published in both the printed and online versions of this Journal are the property of Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, and quoting this source is a requirement for any partial or full reproduction.All contents of this electronic edition, except where otherwise noted, are distributed under a “Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International” (CC BY 4.0) License. You may read here the basic information and the legal text of the license. The indication of the CC BY 4.0 License must be expressly stated in this way when necessary.
Self-archiving in repositories, personal webpages or similar, of any version other than the published by the Editor, is not allowed.