Feminism, theory and practice of a scientific archaeology

Authors

  • María Cruz Berrocal Grupo de Investigación Prehistoria Social y Económica. IH, CCHS, CSIC

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3989/tp.2009.09026

Keywords:

Feminism, Archaeology, Critique, Epistemology, Standpoint feminism

Abstract


The paper reviews American feminist archaeology and its emphasis on the scientific character of the discipline. It is a synthesis of the origin and development of feminist archaeology, its links to gender archaeology and postprocessual archaeology, and its value as an epistemological critique of the discipline. The paper also considers the development of feminist archaeology in Spain, and its link to historical materialist archaeology.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alberts, P. y Medicine, B. (eds.) 1983: The hidden half: studies of Plains Indian women. University Press of America. Washington DC.

Álvarez Lacambra, A. 1997: “Recordando a los conservadores de museos de la posguerra. Entrevista a María Braña de Diego”. Revista de Museología 11: 48-51.

Amorós, C. y de Miguel, A. (eds.) 2005: Teoría feminista: de la ilustración a la globalización I, II y III. Minerva Ediciones, Madrid.

Arnold, K.; Gilchrist, R.; Graves, P. y Taylor, S. 1988: “Women in archaeology”. Archaeological review from Cambridge 7(1): 2-8.

Balaguer Nadal, P. y Oliart Caravatti, C. 2003: “Una revalorización del trabajo femenino: análisis de la reproducción biológica desde una perspectiva socio-económica”. En M.D. Molas y S. Guerra (eds.): Morir en femenino. Mujeres, ideología y prácticas funerarias desde la Prehistoria hasta la Edad Media. Universidad de Barcelona. Barcelona: XX.

Balme, J. y Beck, W. (eds.) 1995: Gendered Archaeology. The Second Australian Women in Archaeology Conference. Australian National University. Canberra.

Baquedano Beltrán, I. 1993: “Encarnación Cabré Herreros. La primera mujer en la Arqueología española”. Revista de Arqueología 146: 54-59.

Bender, B. 2000: “Introduction”. En M. Donald y L. Hurcombe (eds.): Representations of gender from Prehistory to the Present. St. Martin’s. Nueva York: xix-xxix.

Bender, S. 1991: “Towards a history of women in northeastern U.S. archaeology”. En D. Walde y N. Willows N. (eds.): The Archaeology of Gender: Proceedings of the 22nd Annual Chacmool Conference. Archeological Association University of Calgary. Calgary: 211-216.

Bray, T. 2005: “Repatriation and archaeology’s second loss of innocence: on knowledge, power and the past”. Paper presented at School of American Research Conference, August 2004 “Politics, Practice and Theory: repatriation as a force of change in contemporary archaeology”.

Brettel, C. y Sargent, C. (eds.) 1997: Gender in crosscultural perspective. Prentice Hall. New Jersey.

Brettel, C. y Sargent, C. (eds.) 2005: Gender in crosscultural perspective. Prentice Hall. New Jersey.

Brumfiel, E. 1991: “Weaving and cooking: women’s production in Aztec Mexico”. En J. Gero y M. Conkey (eds.): Engendering archaeology: women and prehistory. Blackwell. Oxford: 224-253.

Brumfiel E. 1992: “Breaking and entering the ecosystem: gender, class, and faction steal the show”. American Anthropologist 94(3): 551-567. doi:10.1525/aa.1992.94.3.02a00020

Cárdaba Muñoz, G.; Cruz Berrocal, M.; González Murillo, C.; Mansilla Castaño, A.M.; Rodríguez de la Esperanza, M.J.; Ruiz Martín-Rubio, C. y Tormo Ortiz, M. 1998: “Las primeras generaciones de arqueólogasespañolas: una aproximación”. Revista d’Arqueologia de Ponent 8: 151-166.

Castro, P; Escoriza, T. y Sanahuja, E. 2003: Mujeres y hombres en espacios domésticos. Trabajo y vida social en la Prehistoria de Mallorca (c.700-500 cal ANE). El edificio Alfa del Puig Morter de Son Ferragut (Sineu, Mallorca). Archaeopress. BAR International Series 1162. Oxford.

Castro, P.; Gili, S.; Lull, V.; Micó, R.; Rihuete, C.; Risch, R. y Sanahuja, E. 1998: “Teoría de la producción de la vida social. Mecanismos de explotación en el sudeste ibérico”. Boletín de antropología americana 33: 25-78.

Claassen, C. 1991: “Gender, shellfishing, and the Shell Mound Archaic”. En J. Gero y M. Conkey (eds.): Engendering Archaeology: women and prehistory. Blackwell. Oxford: 276-300.

Claassen, C. (ed.) 1992: Exploring Gender through Archaeology. Prehistory Press. Madison.

Claassen, C. (ed.) 1994: Women in Archaeology. University of Pennsylvania Press. Philadelphia.

Claassen, C. y Joyce, R. (eds.) 1997: Women in Prehistory. North America and Mesoamerica. University of Pennsylvania Press. Philadelphia.

Conkey, M. (con S. Williams) 1991: Original narratives. “The political economy of gender in Archaeology”. En M. di Leonardo (ed.): Gender at the crossroads of knowledge. Feminist Anthropology in the Postmodern era. University of California Press. Berkeley: 102-139.

Conkey, M. 1993: “Making the connections: Feminist theory and Archaeologies of gender”. En H. du Cros y L. Smith (eds.): Women in Archaeology. A feminist critique. Australian National University. Canberra: 3-25.

Conkey, M. 1995: “Paleovisions: interpreting the imagery of Ice Age Europe”. En S. Scott (ed.): The art of interpreting. Pennsylvania State University. University Park: 10-29.

Conkey, M. 1997: “Mobilizing ideologies: Palaeolithic ‘art’, gender trouble, and thinking about alternatives”. En L. Hager (ed.): Women in human evolution. Routledge. Londres: 172-207.

Conkey, M. 2003: “Has Feminism changed Archaeology?” Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 28 (3): 867-880. doi:10.1086/345322

Conkey, M. 2005a: “The Archaeology of gender today: new vistas, new challenges”. En C. Brettel y C. Sargent (eds.): Gender in cross-cultural perspective. Prentice Hall. New Jersey: 53-62.

Conkey, M. 2005b: “Dwelling at the margins, action at the intersection? Feminist and Indigenous archaeologies, 2005”. Archaeologies 1 (1): 9-80 (con comentarios). doi:10.1007/s11759-005-0003-9

Conkey, M. 2007: “Questioning theory: is there a gender of theory in archaeology?” Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 14: 285-310. doi:10.1007/s10816-007-9039-z

Conkey, M. y Gero, J. 1991: “Tensions, pluralities, and engendering archaeology: an introduction to Women and Prehistory”. En J. Gero y M. Conkey (eds.): Engendering Archaeology: Women and Prehistory. Blackwell. Oxford: 3-30.

Conkey, M. y Gero, J. 1997: “Programme to practice: Gender and Feminism in Archaeology”. Annual Review of Anthropology 26: 411-437. doi:10.1146/annurev.anthro.26.1.411

Conkey, M. y Spector, J. 1984: “Archaeology and the Study of Gender”. En M. B. Schiffer (ed.): Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory 7. Academic Press. New York: 1-38.

Conkey, M. y Tringham, R. 1995: “Archaeology and the Goddess: exploring the contours of Feminist archaeology”. En D. Stanton y A. Stewart (eds.): Feminisms in the Academy. University of Michigan Press. Ann Arbor: 199-247.

Conkey, M. y Tringham, R. 1996: “Cultivating thinking/challenging authority: some experiments in feminist pedagogy in archaeology”. En R. Wright (ed.): Gender and Archaeology. University of Pennsylvania Press. Philadelphia: 224-250.

Conkey, M. y Tringham, R. 1998: “Rethinking Figurines: A Critical View from Archaeology of Gimbutas, the ‘Goddess’ and Popular Culture”. En L. Goodison y C. Morris (eds.): Ancient Goddesses: The Myths and the Evidence. British Museum Press. Londres: 22-45.

Colomer, L.; González Marcén, P.; Montón, S. y Picazo, M. (comp.) 1999: Arqueología y teoría feminista. Estudios sobre mujeres y cultura material en arqueología. Icaria/Antrazyt. Barcelona.

Cordell, L. 1991: “Sisters of sun and spade, women archaeologists in the Southwest”. En D. Walde y N. Willows N. (eds.): The Archaeology of Gender: Proceedings of the 22nd Annual Chacmool Conference. Archeological Association University of Calgary. Calgary: 502-509.

Creager, A.; Lunbeck, E. y Schiebinger, L. (eds.) 2001: Feminism in twentieth-century. Science, technology, and medicine. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

Crenshaw, K. 1989: “Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: a black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics”. University of Chicago Legal Forum: 139-167.

Chapa Brunet, T. 2005: “Espacio vivido y espacio representado: las mujeres en la sociedad ibérica”. En I. Morant (dir.): Historia de las Mujeres en España y América Latina. Cátedra. Madrid: 117-137.

Davis, K. 2008: “Intersectionality as buzzword: a sociology of science perspective on what makes feminist theory succesful”. Feminist Theory 9 (1): 67-86. doi:10.1177/1464700108086364

De Miguel, A. 1993: Marxismo y feminismo en Alejandra Kollontai. Instituto de Investigaciones Feministas de la UCM/CAM. Madrid.

Del Valle, T. (ed.) 1993: Gendered Anthropology. Routledge. Londres.

Díaz Andreu, M. 1998: “Spanish women in a changing world. Strategies in the search for self-fulfilment through antiquities”. En M. Díaz-Andreu y M. Sørensen (coord.): Excavating Women. A History of Women in European Archaeology. Routledge. Londres: 125-145.

Díaz Andreu, M. 1998b: “Iberian post-palaeolithic art and gender: discussing human representations in Levantine Art”. Journal of Iberian Archaeology 0: 33-51.

Díaz Andreu, M. 2005: “Género y arqueología: una nueva síntesis”. En M. Sánchez Romero (eds.): Arqueología y Género. Universidad de Granada. Granada: 13-51.

Díaz Andreu, M. y Sanz Gallego, N. 1994: “Women in Spanish Archaeology”. En M.C. Nelson, S.M. Nelson y A. Wylie (eds.): Equity Issues for Women in Archaeology. Archaeological Papers of the American Anthropological Association 5: 121-130.

Díaz Andreu, M. y Sørensen, M. (coord.) 1998: Excavating Women. History of Women in European Archaeology. Routledge. Londres.

Di Leonardo, M. 1991: Gender at the crossroads of knowledge. Feminist anthropology in the Postmodern era. University of California Press. Berkeley.

Dobres, M.A. y Robb, J.E. (eds.) 2000: Agency in archaeology. Routledge. Londres.

Du Cros, H. y Smith, L. (eds.) 1993: Women in Archaeology: A Feminist Critique. Australian National University. Canberra.

Ehrenberg, M. 1989: Women in Prehistory. University of Oklahoma Press. Oklahoma City.

Engelstad, E. 1991: “Images of Power and Contradiction: Feminist Theory and Post-Processual Archaeology”. Antiquity 65: 502-514 (traducción española en Colomer et al. 1999).

Engelstad, E. 2007: “Much more than gender”. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 14: 217-234. doi:10.1007/s10816-007-9035-3

Escoriza Mateu, T. 2002: La representación del cuerpo femenino. BAR. Oxford.

Escoriza Mateu, T. y Sanahuja Yll, E. 2005: “La prehistoria de la autoridad y la relación. Nuevas perspectivas de análisis para las sociedades del pasado”. En M. Sánchez Romero (eds.): Arqueología y Género. Universidad de Granada. Granada: 109-140.

Fernández Martínez, V. 2006: Una Arqueología Crítica. Ciencia, ética y política en la construcción del pasado. Crítica, Barcelona.

Fotiadis, M. 1994: “What is Archaeology’s “Mitigated Objectivism” Mitigated by? Comments on Wylie”. American Antiquity 59 (3): 545-555. doi:10.2307/282467

Fox Keller, E. 1982: “Feminism and science”. En N. Keohane, M. Rosaldo y B. Gelpi (eds.): Feminist theory. A critique of ideology. The University of Chicago Press. Chicago: 113-126.

Fox Keller, E. 1985: Reflections on gender and science. Yale University. New Haven.

Galison, P. y Stump, D. (eds.) 1996: The disunity of Science. Boundaries, contexts, and power. Stanford University Press. Palo Alto.

Gero, J. 1983: “Gender bias in Archaeology: a cross-cultural perspective”. En J. Gero, D. Lacy y M. Blakey (eds.): The Sociopolitics of Archaeology. University of Massachusetts. Amherst.

Gero, J. 1985: “Socio-Politics and theWoman-at-Home Ideology”. American Antiquity 50 (2): 342-350 (traducción española en Colomer et al. 1999).

Gero, J. 1993: “The social world of prehistoric facts: gender and power in Paleoindian research”. En H. du Cros y L. Smith (eds.): Women in Archaeology: A Feminist Critique. Australian National University. Canberra: 31-40.

Gero, J. y Conkey, M. (eds.) 1991: Engendering Archaeology. Women and Prehistory. Blackwell. Oxford. Gifford-González, D. 1993: “‘You can hide, but you can’t run’: representations of women’s work in illustrations of Paleolithic life”. Visual Anthropology Review 9 (1): 3-21.

Gilchrist, R. 1992: “Review of Experiencing Archaeology by Michael Shanks”. Archaeological Review from Cambridge 11: 188-191.

Gilchrist, R. 1994: Gender and Material Culture: The Archaeology of Religious Women. Routledge. Nueva York.

Gilchrist, R. 1999: Gender and Archaeology: Contesting the Past. Routledge. Londres.

Gilchrist, R. 2007: “Archaeology and the life course: a time and age for gender”. En L. Meskell y R. Preucel (eds.): A companion to Social Archaeology. Blackwell. Oxford: 142-160.

Gillespie, S. 2000: “Personhood, agency, and mortuary ritual: a case study from the ancient Maya”. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 20: 71-112.

González Marcén, P. 2000: “Mujeres, espacio y arqueología. Una primera aproximación desde la investigación española”. En P. González Marcén (ed.): Espacios de género en arqueología. Arqueología Espacial 22. Seminario de Arqueología y Etnología Turolense. Teruel: 11-22.

González Marcén, P. 2005: “Redes de complicidades y objetos vividos”. En M. Sánchez Romero (eds.): Arqueología y Género. Universidad de Granada. Granada: 491-499.

González Marcén, P. y Picazo Gurina, M. 2005: “Arqueología de la vida cotidiana”. En M. Sánchez Romero (eds.): Arqueología y Género. Universidad de Granada. Granada: 141-158.

Gregory Kohlstedt, S. y Longino, H. (eds.) 1997: Women, gender, and science. New directions. Osiris (volumen especial) 12.

Hanen, M. y Kelley, J. 1992: “Gender and archaeological knowledge”. En L. Embree (ed.): Metaarchaeology: reflections by archaeologists and philosophers. Kluwer Academic Publishers. Dordrecht: 195-225.

Harding, S. 1986: The Science Question in Feminism. Cornell University Press. Ithaca.

Harding, S. (ed.) 1987: Feminism and methodology. Indiana University Press. Bloomington.

Harding, S. 1991: Whose Science? Whose Knowledge? Thinking from Women’s Lives. Cornell University Press. Ithaca.

Harding, S. 1998: Is Science Multicultural? Postcolonialism, Feminism & Epistemologies. Indiana University Press. Bloomington.

Hartsock, N. 1987: “The feminist standpoint. Developing the ground for a specifically feminist historical materialism”. En S. Harding (ed.): Feminism and methodology. Indiana University Press. Bloomington: 157-180.

Hastorf, C. 1991: “Gender, space, and food in Prehistory”. En J. Gero y M. Conkey (eds.): Engendering archaeology: women and prehistory. Blackwell. Oxford: 132-159.

Haug, F. 1983: “The Women’s Question and the Class Question”. En S. Hänninen y L. Paldaìn (eds.): Rethinking ideology: a Marxist debate. International General. Nueva York: 144-149.

Hawkesworth, M. 1989: “Knowers, Knowing, Known: Feminist Theory and Claims of Truth”. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 14 (3): 533-557. doi:10.1086/494523

Hernando Gonzalo, A. (ed.) 2000a: La construcción de la subjetividad femenina. Instituto de investigaciones feministas de la UCM. Madrid.

Hernando Gonzalo, A. 2000b: “Hombres del Tiempo y Mujeres del Espacio. Individualidad, poder y relaciones de género”. Arqueología Espacial 22: 23-44.

Hernando Gonzalo, A. 2002: Arqueología de la identidad. Akal. Madrid.

Hernando Gonzalo, A. (ed.) 2003: ¿Desean las mujeres el poder? Cinco reflexiones en torno a un deseo conflictivo. Minerva Ediciones. Madrid.

Hernando Gonzalo, A. 2005a: “Agricultoras y campesinas en las primeras sociedades productoras”. En I. Morant (dir.): Historia de las Mujeres en España y América Latina. Cátedra. Madrid: 79-116.

Hernando Gonzalo, A. 2005b: “Mujeres y Prehistoria: en torno a la cuestión del origen del patriarcado”. En M. Sánchez Romero (eds.): Arqueología y Género. Universidad de Granada. Granada: 73-108.

Hernando Gonzalo, A. 2007: “Sexo, Género y Poder. Breve reflexión sobre algunos conceptos manejados en la Arqueología del Género”. Complutum 18: 167-174.

Hernando, A. 2008: Género y sexo. Mujeres, identidad y modernidad. Claves de Razón Práctica 188: 64-70.

Hill Collins, P. 1989: “The Social Construction of Black Feminist Thought”. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 14 (4): 745-773. doi:10.1086/494543

Hornos Mata, F. y Rísquez Cuenca, C. 2005: “Representación en la actualidad. Las mujeres en los museos”. En M. Sánchez Romero (eds.): Arqueología y Género. Universidad de Granada. Granada: 479-490.

Jackson, T. 1991: “Pounding Acorn:Women’s Production as Social and Economic Focus”. En J. Gero y M. Conkey (eds.): Engendering Archaeology: women and prehistory. Blackwell. Oxford: 301-325.

Joyce, R. 2000: Gender and power in Prehispanic Mesoamerica. University of Texas Press. Austin. Joyce, R. 2005: “Archaeology of the body”. Annual Review of Anthropology 34: 139-158. doi:10.1146/annurev.anthro.33.070203.143729

Joyce, R. 2007: “Embodied subjectivity: gender, femininity, masculinity, sexuality”. En L. Meskell y R. Preucel (eds.): A companion to Social Archaeology. Blackwell, Oxford: 82-95.

Joyce, R.; Guyer, C. y Joyce, M. 2000: Sister Stories. http://www.nyupress.org/sisterstories/index.html. New York University Press, Nueva York.

Keohane, N., Rosaldo, M. y Gelpi, B. (eds.) 1982: Feminist theory. A critique of ideology. The University of Chicago Press. Chicago.

Leacock, E. 1972: “Introduction”. F. Engels, The Origin of the Family, Private Property and the State. International Publishers. Nueva York.

Leacock, E. 1978: “Women’s status in egalitarian society: implications for social evolution”. Current Anthropology 19 (2): 247-275. doi:10.1086/202074

Levine, M. 1991: “An historical overview of research on women in archaeology”. En D. Walde y N. Willows N. (eds.): The Archaeology of Gender: Proceedings of the 22nd Annual Chacmool Conference. Archeological Association University of Calgary. Calgary: 177-186.

Little, B. 1994: “Consider the Hermaphroditic Mind: Comment on ‘The Interplay of Evidential Constraints and Political Interests: Recent Archaeological Research on Gender’”. American Antiquity 59 (3): 539-544. doi:10.2307/282466

Loder, N. 2000: “U.S science shocked by revelations of sexual discrimination”. Nature 405 (6787): 713-714. doi:10.1038/35015266 PMid:10864332

Longino, H. 1990: Science as social knowledge: values and objectivity in scientific inquiry. Princeton University Press. Princeton.

Mahmood, S. 2001: “Feminist theory, embodiment, and the docile agent: some reflections on the Egyptian Islamic Revival”. Cultural antrhopology 6 (2): 202-236.

Mascia-Lees, F.; Sharpe, P. y Ballerino Cohen, C. 1989: “The Postmodernist turn in Anthropology: cautions from a Feminist Perspective”. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 15 (1): 7-33. doi:10.1086/494562

Meskell, L. 1999: Archaeologies of social life: age, sex, class et-cetera in Ancient Egypt. Blackwell. Oxford.

Meskell, L. 2002: Private life in New Kingdom Egypt. Princeton University Press. Princeton.

Meskell, L. y Joyce, R. 2003: Embodied lives: figuring ancient Maya and Egyptian experience. Routledge, Londres.

Miller, V. (ed.) 1988: The role of gender in Precolumbian art and architecture. University Press of America. Lanham.

Montón Subías, S.; González Marcén, P.; Picazo, M. y Sánchez Romero, M. (eds.) 2008: Engendering social dynamics: the archaeology of maintenance activities. BAR International Series 1862, Oxford.

Morant, I. (dir.) 2005: Historia de las Mujeres en España y América Latina I. Cátedra. Madrid.

Moore, H. 1988: Feminism and Anthropology. Polity Press. Cambridge (traducción española de 1999, Antropología y feminismo. Cátedra. Madrid).

Moser, S. 1998: Ancestral images: the iconography of human origins. Cornell University Press. Ithaca.

Nelson, S. 1991: “Women archaeologists in Asia and the Pacific”. En D. Walde y N. Willows N. (eds.): The Archaeology of Gender: Proceedings of the 22nd Annual Chacmool Conference. Archeological Association University of Calgary. Calgary: 217-219.

Nelson, S. 1997: Gender In Archaeology: Analyzing Power and Prestige. Altamira Press.Walnut Creek.

Nelson, S. (ed.) 2006: Handbook of gender in archaeology. Altamira Press. Lanham.

Nelson, S. (ed.) 2007: Women in Antiquity: Theoretical Approaches to Gender and Archaeology. Altamira Press. Lanham.

Nelson, M.; Nelson, S. y Wylie, A. (eds.) 1994: Equity Issues for Women in Archaeology. Archaeological Papers 5. American Anthropological Association. Washington DC.

Parezo, N. (ed.) 1993: Hidden Scholars: Women Anthropologists and the Native American Southwest. University of New Mexico Press. Albuquerque.

Patai, D. y Koertge, N. 1994: Professing Feminism: Inside the Strange World of Women’s Studies. New Republic/Basic Books. Nueva York.

Pattyname, P. 2006: “Intersectionality”. European Journal of Women’s Studies 13 (3): 187-92. doi:10.1177/1350506806065751

Picazo, M. 1997: “Hearth and home: the timing of maintenance activities”. En J. Moore y E. Scott (ed.): Invisible people and processes. Writing Gender and Childhood into European Archaeology. Leicester University Press. Londres: 59-67.

Pollock, S. 1991: “Women in a men’s world: images of Sumerian women”. En J. Gero y M. Conkey (eds.): Engendering Archaeology: women and prehistory. Blackwell. Oxford: 366-387.

Preucel, R. 1995: “The postprocessual condition”. Journal of Archaeological Research 3 (2): 147-175. doi:10.1007/BF02231436

Querol, A. 2000: “El espacio de la mujer en el discurso sobre el origen de la humanidad”. En P. González (ed.): Espacios de género en arqueología. Arqueología Espacial 22, Seminario de Arqueología y Etnología Turolense. Teruel: 161-173.

Querol, A. 2001: Adán y Darwin. Síntesis. Madrid.

Querol, A. 2005a: “‘El origen del hombre’ y la identidad femenina: los mitos duraderos”. En M. Sánchez Romero (ed.): Arqueología y género. Universidad de Granada. Granada: 441-456.

Querol, A. 2005b: “Las mujeres en los relatos sobre los orígenes de la humanidad”. En I. Morant (dir.): Historia de las Mujeres en España y América Latina. Cátedra. Madrid: 27-77.

Querol, A. y Treviño, C. 2004: La mujer en “el origen del hombre”. Bellaterra. Barcelona.

Reyman, J. (ed.) 1992: Rediscovering Our Past: Essays on the History of American Archaeology. Avebury. Aldershot.

Roberts, C. 1993: “A critical approach to gender as a category of analysis in archaeology”. En H. du Cros y L. Smith (eds.): Women in Archaeology: a feminist critique. Australian National University. Canberra: 16-21.

Romanowicz, J. y Wright, R. 1996: “Gendered perspectives in the classroom”. En R. Wright (ed.): Gender and archaeology. University of Pennsylvania Press. Philadelphia: 199-224.

Sacks, K. 1974: “Engels revisited: women, the organization of production, and private property”. En M. Rosaldo y L. Lamphere (eds.): Woman, Culture and Society. Stanford University Press. Palo Alto: 207-222.

Sacks, K. 1976: “State bias and women’s status”. American Anthropologist 78 (3): 565-569. doi:10.1525/aa.1976.78.3.02a00040

San Clemente Geijo, M.P. 1998: “Vera Leisner”. Revista de Arqueología 205: 56-59.

Sanahuja Yll, E. 1991: “Modelos explicativos sobre los orígenes y la evolución de la humanidad”. En L. Luna (comp.): Mujeres y Sociedad. Nuevos enfoques teóricos y metodológicos. Universidad de Barcelona. Barcelona: 149-167.

Sanahuja Yll, E. 1997a: “Sexuar el pasado. Una propuesta arqueológica”. En C. Segura (coord.): La historia de las mujeres en el nuevo paradigma de la historia. A.C. Al-Mudayna. Madrid: 15-24.

Sanahuja Yll, E. 1997b: “Marxismo y feminismo”. Boletín de Antropología Americana 31: 7-14.

Sanahuja Yll, E. 2001: “Feminismo, marxismo y arqueología”. Astigi Vetus 1: 55-63.

Sanahuja Yll, E. 2002: Cuerpos sexuados, objetos y prehistoria. Cátedra. Madrid.

Sánchez Liranzo, O. 2005a: “La investigación prehistórica en Andalucía occidental. Un estudio historiográfico”. En M. Sánchez Romero (eds.): Arqueología y Género. Universidad de Granada. Granada: 457-478.

Sánchez Liranzo, O. 2005b: “Hacia una arqueología más ‘social’”. En M. Sánchez Romero (eds.): Arqueología y Género. Universidad de Granada. Granada: 53-72.

Sánchez Romero, M. 2005 (ed.): Arqueología y Género. Universidad de Granada. Granada.

Sánchez Romero, M. 2007 (ed.): Arqueología de las mujeres y las relaciones de género. Complutum 18.

Schiebinger, L. 1997: “Creating sustainable Science”. Osiris 12: 201-216.

Schiebinger, L. 2003: “Introduction”. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, Issue on Feminism inside the sciences, 28 (3): 859-866.

Schmidt, R. y Voss, B. (eds.) 2000: Archaeologies of sexuality. Routledge. Londres.

Scott, J. 1986: “Gender: A Useful Category of Historical Analysis”. The American Historical Review 91 (5): 1053-1075. doi:10.2307/1864376

Scott, E. (ed.) 1994a: Those of Little Note: gender, race, and class in Historical archaeology. University of Arizona Press. Tucson.

Scott, E. 1994b: “Through the lens of gender: archaeology, inequality, and those ‘of little note’”. En E.M. Scott (ed.): Those of Little Note: gender, race, and class in Historical archaeology. University of Arizona Press. Tucson: 3-24.

Seifert, D.J. 1991: “Introduction”. Gender in Historical Archaeology, Historical Archaeology 25 (4): 1-5.

Shapiro, J. 1981: “Anthropology and the study of gender”. En E. Langland y W. Gove (eds.): A feminist perspective in the academy. The difference it makes. The University of Chicago Press. Chicago: 110-129.

Smith, L. y Du Cros, H. 1995: Reflections on women in archaeology. En J. Balme y W. Beck (eds.): Gendered Archaeology: The Second Australian Women in Archaeology Conference. Australian National University. Canberra: 7-27.

Sørensen, M.L. Stig 2000: Gender Archaeology. Polity Press. Cambridge.

Spector, J. 1991: “What this awl means: toward a feminist archaeology”. En J. Gero y M. Conkey (eds.): Engendering archaeology: women and prehistory. Blackwell. Oxford: 388-406 (traducción española en Colomer et al. 1999).

Spector, J. 1993: What This Awl Means: Feminist Archaeology in a Wahpeton Dakota Village. Minnesota Historical Society. Minneapolis.

Spector, J. y Whelan, M. 1989: “Incorporating gender into Archaeology courses”. En S. Morgen (ed.): Gender and Anthropology: critical reviews for research and teaching. American Anthropological Association. Washington DC: 65-94.

Spender, D. 1985: Man Made Language. Routledge & Kegan Paul. Londres [original de 1980].

Spriggs, M. 1993: “Quantifying women’s oppression in prehistory: the Aneityum (Vanuatu) case”. En H. du Cros y L. Smith (eds.): Women in Archaeology: A Feminist Critique. Australian National University. Canberra: 143-150.

Strathern, M. 1983: “Applied Feminism”. RAIN 54: 1-2.

Tomášková, S. 2007: “Mapping a Future: Archaeology, Feminism, and Scientific Practice”. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 14: 264-284. doi:10.1007/s10816-007-9038-0

Tringham, R. 1991: “Households with faces: the challenge of gender in prehistoric architectural remains”. En J. Gero y M. Conkey (eds.): Engendering archaeology: women and prehistory. Blackwell. Oxford: 93-131 (traducción española en Colomer et al. 1999).

Vargas, I. 2004: “Hacia una teoría feminista en arqueología”. Otras miradas 4 (2): 62-75.

Voss, B. 2000: “Feminisms, Queer Theories, and the Archaeological Study of Past Sexualities”. World Archaeology (Queer Archaeologies) 32(2): 180-192. doi:10.1080/00438240050131171

Walde, D. y Willows, N. (eds.) 1991: The Archaeology of Gender: Proceedings of the 22nd Annual Chacmool Conference. Archeological Association University of Calgary. Calgary.

Wall, D. 1994: The Archaeology of Gender: Separating the spheres in Urban America. Plenum. Nueva York.

Watson, P. y Kennedy, M. 1991: “The Development of Horticulture in the Eastern Woodlands of North America: Women’s Role”. En J. Gero y M. Conkey (eds.): Engendering archaeology: women and prehistory. Blackwell. Oxford: 255-275.

Wiber, M. 1997: Erect men, undulating women: the visual imagery of gender, race and progress in reconstructive illustrations of human evolution. Wilfrid Laurier University Press. Waterloo.

Wilkie, L. y Howlett Hayes, K. 2006: “Engendered and feminist archaeologies of the recent and documented pasts”. Journal of Archaeological Research 14: 243-264. doi:10.1007/s10814-006-9005-4

Wolff, J. 1990: Feminine sentences. University of California Press. Berkeley.

Wright, R. (ed.) 1996: Gender and Archaeology. University of Pennsylvania Press. Philadelphia.

Wylie, A. 1992: “The Interplay of Evidential Constraints and Political Interests: Recent Archaeological Research on Gender”. American Antiquity 57 (1): 15-35 (traducción española en Colomer et al. 1999).

Wylie, A. 1994: “On ‘Capturing facts alive in the past’ (or present): response to Fotiadis and to Little”. American Antiquity 59 (3): 556-560. doi:10.2307/282468

Wylie, A. 1996: “The constitution of archaeological evidence: gender politics and science”. En P. Galison y D. Stump (eds.): The Disunity of Science. Boundaries, Contexts, and Power. Stanford University Press. Palo Alto: 311-343.

Wylie, A. 1997: “The engendering of archaeology: refiguring feminist science studies”. Osiris 12: 80-99.

Wylie, A. 2000: “Questions of evidence, legitimacy, and the (Dis)Unity of Science”. American Antiquity 65 (2): 227-237. doi:10.2307/2694057

Wylie, A. 2001: “Doing Social Science as a Feminist: the engendering of Archeology”. En A. Creager, E. Lunbeck y L. Schiebinger (eds.): Feminism in twentieth-century. Science, technology and medicine. The University of Chicago Press. Chicago: 23-45.

Wylie, A. 2002: Thinking from things. Essays in the Philosophy of Archaeology. University of California Press. Berkeley.

Downloads

Published

2009-12-30

How to Cite

Cruz Berrocal, M. (2009). Feminism, theory and practice of a scientific archaeology. Trabajos De Prehistoria, 66(2), 25–43. https://doi.org/10.3989/tp.2009.09026

Issue

Section

Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)